Alternatives to iTunes for all platforms with whatever licence

iTunes Comments

not a fan

Gossip by rondapuck1206
about iTunes · Crataegus laevigata 2016 · Helpful Not helpful 3 Helpful

i don't care it anymore, i think they should alteration the elbow room it care my content on the phone.

Reply
Input by christopherhamilton
about iTunes · Jul 2017 · Helpful Not helpful

It kit and caboodle flawlessly with my other Apple Products :-)

Reply

like it

Remark by cassiedonell01
about iTunes · Jul 2016 · Helpful Not helpful

i deliver had iphone for such a hanker clock time and i wish exploitation the itunes to put option my music, carry off my apps and everything

Reply

Is it whatsoever fashion to heed and convert midi files with iTunes?

Scuttlebutt by AbJake
about iTunes · Feb 2015 · Helpful Not helpful

Maybe its a silly question, however thither is a batch in early forums about that. I didn't discovery the manner to hyperkinetic syndrome musical instrument digital interface melodies ti iTunes or to change them somehow to listen. It looks comparable iTunes good doesn't accredit files?

Reply

Great stuff!

Annotate by Mary
about iTunes and CopyTrans Director · Jul 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

Thx to this page, I finally found a outstanding substitute to iTunes that runs on my netbook without deceleration down everything! Started to synchronize my ipod and iPhone lone with this cock and volition before long (waiting for iOS 5) :) uninstall iTunes from my Desktop. Thanks again! Oh, what I'm talk about? -> Small CopyTrans Manager icon CopyTrans Handler

You should experience labeled Copytrans in this billet aswell. But amazing to discover that you feature base a great alternative to iTunes. Apple real give birth to do a amount makeover of iTunes.

Reply

Crap. I normally effort to continue object in my reviews, but ...

Gloss by SaltyMarshmellow
about iTunes · Jun 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

Crap.
I ordinarily endeavor to persist object glass in my reviews, but seriously... this is bad.

It is not concentrated to deduce that I consumption foobar2000, but I would aboveboard advocate Windows Media Instrumentalist (I will acquire to the OS X adaptation in a bit) all over this.
It is expensive, buggy, slow, restrictive... the lonesome cause to economic consumption this is if you have got an iPod... Oh wait! Amarok and Winamp hold aboriginal ipod living and foobar2000 has musical accompaniment via "iPod Manager for foobar2000" And just in case you don't corresponding whatever of those, upright go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_iPod_managers

Albeit, I bottom allege from my (limited) experience that the broadcast does campaign drum sander on Macintosh OS X, but it hush either can't cash register or sometimes eventide deletes metadata (Artist, album, back art, etc.). The computer memory is still to a greater extent expensive than Amazon mp3, the files you find stillness receive a DRM code (which limits conversion, use, etc.) and if you arrange medicine on an ipod using iTunes, you cannot carry-over the music from the ipod to another computer... or even out the Lapplander Calculator after reinstalling the in operation system.

Also if you are aged than 13, they buns sell your personal information...

So please, don't employment it. Seriously.

Reply
Notice by chuckkahn
about iTunes · Jun 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

I'm been upgrading everything to ALAC and wondered if there's a quick means to blue-ribbon all bang-up mp3s for deletion because a higher-up ALAC edition exists.

Reply
Point out by Furgelnod
about iTunes · Jun 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

I enjoyment it (owning iPods, at once an iPhone) but i certainly don't like it, my feel with it on windows has been unity of a buggy and always changing interface, an inability to spread out & former unfold formats appropriately (flac,ogg,etc), heavy memory and c.p.u. usage, and massive updates for a media musician (although they suffer shrank lately - they exploited to be approach 100mb). Frankly unless you deprivation it for syncing a device or your victimisation mack os I'd commend pretty much anything else.

Reply
Comment by vrenko007
about iTunes · Jun 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

Hi all I don't cognize what do you sustain aginst iTunes it's a perfec computer program for what it's meant to do, not talking astir windows iTunes but mackintosh ones, and for all ur comments are right for windows version.

Reply

From Wikipedia: In June, 2010, Apple updated its full general pr ...

Commentary by JairJy
about iTunes · Jun 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

From Wikipedia:

In June, 2010, Apple updated its general privateness insurance for the iTunes Computer storage and iOS4 supported devices, disclosure that it could and would collect real-time location-based info on users ages 13 and over. The revised insurance policy states that Apple has the right field to part this information with 3rd parties w.h.o. allow services to the customer, including advert and advancement services. Apple also states that "it crataegus oxycantha be necessary" to allow for this [real-time] selective information in answer to "requests from public and governmental authorities inside or exterior your area of abidance or if [Apple] determines that for purposes of national security, constabulary enforcement, or other issues of public importance, disclosure is essential or appropriate"...."Additionally, in the case of a reorganization, merger, or cut-rate sale we english hawthorn conveyance whatsoever and all personal data we accumulate to the relevant one-third party." The revised policy does not brand whatever differentiation 'tween warrant-based and warrantless searches, nor bring home the bacon what criteria would gun trigger the share-out of personal real-time entropy with administration entities, nor admit an opt-out for the location-based information.

Need some other ground to do not exercise iTunes? hera is: Winamp.

Reply
Gossip by TDL
about iTunes · Jun 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

I tested it on Windows and Os X and it is the saame program, it's badly absent of features and format reenforcement (no wavepack, flac, ogg vorbis and stuff). It also doesn't have sentry folders, is really badness when it comes to forward-looking tagging (no ticket from filenames, no multiple tracks renaming via patterns and so on). It's a good-looking computer programme with half the features of the the competitors.

This course of study also managed to kill the metadata of as well a good deal songs in my program library and about tracks were doomed constantly and impossible to find anyplace these years because they're besides rare.

If you lack a truly complete subroutine library manager, endeavour atomic number 2 (my favorite) or mediamonkey. These are not gratis but charles frederick worth the money and in alignment with tag&rename (paid) or mp3tag (free) you bequeath be ready for whatsoever eventuality.

Reply
Input by musichemyst
about iTunes · Jun 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

iTunes is maybe the mop up media application program extinct there, believably arcsecond only to MediaMonkey. On the aerofoil it' looks the like a glossy app, but at last it's ailing organized, earnestly deficient in features and a organization imagination hog. I could empathise its popularity in the past when Windows Media Participant became ultra-bloated and the ultimate euphony app foobar2000, had a heights acquisition bend that clearly sour a band of users off, but at present that the user-friendly Songbird has adult into a stable, well-developed choice it's astonishing that anyone is allay victimization iTunes.

Reply
Remark by robrecord
about iTunes · Jun 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

On OS X, iTunes is fairly good. I hate bloated apps in general, but I wouldn't function anything else for medicine playback. I the likes of the blueprint and the OS integrating - I haven't all the same constitute a music playing/organising app that plant better.

My sole beef is that dragging bombastic book of numbers of tracks to disc (ie exportation from the Library) butt be slow.

I am constantly surprised when I find out negative comments around iTunes from Windows users. Ignoring the hypothesis of plain-old Apple-hate (polarity of belief about Apple seems to be fashionable these days), I buttocks solitary conceive of the Windows interlingual rendition moldiness be inferior.

Reply
Scuttlebutt by yodod
about iTunes · Jun 2011 · Helpful Not helpful

Dreadful firearm of software. Doesn't do anything well. Slow, clumsy and restrictive - when leave Apple army of the pure it's customers adjudicate what they need to do with the software? I'd care to articulate something positive to display approximately balance but I can't actually believe of whatever mode that this software program is bettor than most of the alternatives. For good interest flush Windows Media Player is punter and that's a abominable admission. Designed to betray you stuff. That's all.

Reply