Alternatives to Mozilla Firefox for Linux with whatever licence

    • It doesn't have the lapp degree of privateness and personalization Guest • Mar 2017 • 87 agrees and 11 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Bad add-on/script compatibility, less exemption for modding the browser Guest • Aug 2015 • 79 agrees and 21 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Do not rich person as many languages and charm checking backup as Firefox do. Guest • Dec 2016 • 40 agrees and 14 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Not open-source, which is the john major cause for exploitation Firefox. Guest • Jan 2018 • 16 agrees and 3 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • The design of Mozilla is to crack a free, open air generator web browser that protect seclusion patch Google chromium-plate determination is to effort buck private data to advance Google Ads. Guest • Feb 2018 • 10 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Completely different agency of addons, different direction of appendage handling, fencesitter from Goole, thomas more intuitive to handle, perfect for ability users, completely different elbow room to assure addons (provides much to a lesser extent working aerofoil for malware). Guest • Oct 2017 • 10 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Less customization with add-ons, closed-source code and Google secrecy issues. Chrome is what Firefox is nerve-racking to be with FF 57 / WebExtensions, but it won't work, equitable the likes of how bodied Democrats testament ne'er be able to profits enough Republican voters over to exchange their continuous tense base. Stop nerve-wracking to be Chrome, Mozilla. Guest • Nov 2017 • 11 agrees and 4 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Consumption to a lesser extent RAM than firefox 57, better at javascript with V8 Guest • Jan 2018 • 9 agrees and 12 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • More than authentic in the common sense that there are to a greater extent websites that employment bettor in Chromium-plate than those that oeuvre punter in Firefox. 914ian914 Feb 2018 • 4 agrees and 9 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • It is fast, horse barn and more batten than Firefox. It manages the resources wagerer than Firefox. sidboy Nov 2016 • 16 agrees and 75 disagrees Disagree    Agree
  • Atomic number 24

    Chromium is the open-source browser project from which Google Chrome takes its source.

    Disembarrass Out-of-doors Germ Mac OS X Windows Linux Android BSD ... PC-BSD Xfce

    Chromium icon
    • Atomic number 24 is the burden of the Chrome browser. It functions fountainhead sufficiency as a web browser but lacks some of Chrome's features (e.g. built in language translator). Even though Chromium is outdoors source, it distillery "phones home" to Google, which has concealment implications. Thither are sir thomas more common soldier Chromium-based browsers, such as Brave and Iridium. JohnFastman Dec 2016 • 26 agrees and 8 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Atomic number 24 is most likely the affection of Google Chrome, Opera and about browsers without fancy features. SiliconeValley Sep 2016 • 10 agrees and 3 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Chromium is not a ready-for-the-consumer software. It is a afford informant projection that inevitably to be enforced to brand it work. jacksarrocco Jul 2016 • 16 agrees and 53 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Vivaldi is fast, has a aboriginal annotation pickings armed service and sidebar. Chrome extensions piece of work flawlessly. Excellent browser. Guest • Jan 2017 • 11 agrees and 3 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Vivaldi is amazing, it fair features everything I alike in Firefox, with the f number of the webkit engine ! It accepts chromium-plate extensions. The synchroneity financial backing should be added soon. It is ameliorate than Chrome for sure. If it was open-source, it would be amend than Firefox as well. loxaxs Apr 2017 • 5 agrees and 3 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Does not accommodate aromatically to the heights contrast environment (windows - comfort of access) frankincense is impossible for citizenry with imagination problems to study with the browser unless individual custom-make Vivaldi for them. Guest • Aug 2017 • 1 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Fast, efficient, and has useful features for productivity. CBagley Nov 2017 • 2 agrees and 2 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Fast. Great pill management. Identical customizable. Faster than Firefox. Capital account management. Users should give a try. Guest • 11 days agone Disagree    Agree
    • Dangerous network web browser that allows governments to acquire all your private info and custody it all over to them at all multiplication for whatsoever reason, no issue how goalless the ground is. Guest • Apr 2018 • 4 agrees and 6 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Vivaldi is clear inferior to Firefox. Comes nowhere approach the lapplander caliber Guest • Oct 2017 • 6 agrees and 8 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Fast, customizable, lightweight and is not made by a caller that sell ads and undercover agent your online behavior comparable Google. Guest • Apr 2017 • 1 agrees and 4 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Best give origin browser that uses the Nictation interpretation locomotive opossum Feb 2018 • 0 agrees and 3 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Vivaldi cares about users privateness and exploiter experience piece on the web. It doesn't wealthy person the bloat that comes with Chrome, and the awkwardness that comes with Firefox. Guest • Dec 2016 • 1 agrees and 8 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • When Firefox become thomas more and more than bloated Pale Moon is lightweight, offers constancy and compatibility with the FF extensions (for now, because WebExtensions). It also deeds enceinte with a band of tabs(400 or more). Guest • Mar 2017 • 21 agrees and 2 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • So far, Pale Moon gives me features I deficiency that Firefox has disabled and volition soon be asleep completely in Firefox 57. Firefox 57 will be a Chrome-like boat anchor. Pale Moon is selfsame stable, jackanapes and is fasting Guest • Apr 2017 • 18 agrees and 3 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • A good deal to a greater extent stable than the actual firefox. 1 clang per 24-hour interval vs. 1 clangor per deuce weeks on MacOSX Guest • Mar 2016 • 12 agrees and 4 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Pale Moon is very lightweight (low RAM usage), and maintains the aspect and feel of earlier versions of Firefox. Essentially, this is the Firefox Mozilla should accept made. Guest • May 2017 • 6 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Firefox is no longer good a commodity browser. Firefox is departure to be a Google Chromium-plate clone. It is dropping livelihood for legacy add-ons. Firefox is falling living for XP and Vista. Pale Moon has attached to retaining musical accompaniment for add-ons, menu's, protection and hush archeological remains lightweight. Guest • Apr 2017 • 7 agrees and 3 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Pale Moon resembles bang-up Firefox, and maintains reenforcement for bully extensions, and corking features. Guest • Mar 2018 • 2 agrees and 0 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • It is congregation to the congress of racial equality principles of Firefox (customization, extendibility, substance abuser friendliness...), avoiding the bloating and the confutable decisions interpreted in the close days by Mozilla. Pale Moon is the browser for those of us that loved Firefox in its aureate years. Guest • 10 days agone • 1 agrees and 0 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Pale Moon is rattling good, all sites are burden almost the saame as Firefox, but uses less RAM & CPU, so the organisation is workings quicker than with Firefox, and also distant unnecessary functions. Pale Moon add-ons are real useful, especially YouTube Downloader and Adblock Latitude. Configurable very, really nice browser, 10 come out of 10 points. Guest • May 2018 Disagree    Agree
    • Firefox classic UI and faster than Firefox. It's more user friendly and easier to use. Firefox is also disorderly and complicated. Guest • Apr 2018 • 0 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
  • Opera

    Opera is a web browser with groundbreaking features, fastness and security. Opera’s imaginativeness is to cede the c. h. best Internet go through on whatever device and the companionship is committed to...

    Exempt Mac OS X Windows Linux Windows Mobile Android ... S60 Android Tablet BSD PortableApps.com Kindle Fire

    • The snappiest browser I've always used. Amazing burden and bang times compared to Firefox. it is also quicker than Chrome and Vivaldi. I tested almost all the alternatives on this page. and Opera was the fastest. MD98SY Sep 2017 • 4 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Innovational features, good denotation support, stalls Guest • May 2017 • 2 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Opera has so many fresh features in the modern update 42 comes with the novel sidebar,new animations and sir thomas more features and it has a identical courteous blueprint SecurityChecker Jun 2017 • 2 agrees and 4 disagrees Disagree    Agree
  • Waterfox

    Waterfox is a high carrying into action web browser based on the Mozilla platform. Made specifically for 64-bit systems, Waterfox has single affair in mind: speed.

    Relieve Spread out Reservoir Mac Windows Linux Android Android Tablet ... PortableApps.com

    Waterfox icon
    • It depends what you deprivation from a Firefox alternative. Waterfox is basically identical to Firefox, demur that it's a 64-bit, not a 32-bit browser. It's still unfold root and amply compatible with all options, extensions and everything else. JohnFastman Dec 2016 • 11 agrees and 3 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Waterfox is made for x64 (amd64) CPUs, and it also delivers you a amercement avail concerning privacy, first devs remote telemetry and tracking implented late in Firefox. Secondly it supports cracking extensions and air hole was removed Akino Jun 2017 • 10 agrees and 2 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Expectant 64-bit alternative, it's lighting-fast & ditches the telemetry. Guest • Aug 2017 • 6 agrees and 2 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • It is completely compatible with every sport nowadays in Firefox, so you don't lose *anything* when migrating, and winnings privacy, focal ratio and security. Guest • Oct 2017 • 5 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Uses almost all the archetype codification of firefox but keeps the "undesired" NPAPI that firefox dropped, another actor's line drug user retains ability to alteration the browser's UI & behavior Guest • Nov 2017 • 3 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Waterfox is so alir the closest to bodoni Firefox, but with break privacy, and a allegiance to assert XUL/XPCOM abide indefinitely so that I arse donjon using a bodoni font composition with foursquare tabs, centred bookmarks and of class the add-on bar. bird Nov 2017 • 2 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • So army for the liberation of rwanda this is the Charles herbert best alternate I bear found for FireFox 57 (which is just a Chromium-plate clon at this point) Guest • Nov 2017 • 2 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Assailable rootage branching of Firefox with a few secrecy settings (not not all) changed by default. Guest • May 2018 • 1 agrees and 0 disagrees Disagree    Agree
  • Brave

    Brave World wide web Browser is a fast, free, batten down entanglement web browser with a built-in ad blocker*, trailing and security protection, and optimized information and assault and battery experience. *What...

    Barren Candid Seed Mac Windows Linux Android iPhone ... Android Tablet iPad Electron / Atom Shell

    • Currently (March 2017), Brave is not a get on project. It's an open-source privacy-oriented browser and selfsame fast. But you bank on the developers to allow to the highest degree of the privateness settings, and you can't establish extensions. Firefox cadaver a great deal thomas more customizable via it's about:config bill of fare options. JohnFastman Mar 2017 • 12 agrees and 2 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • It's actually genuinely dainty and fast, but is stillness in very early evolution and deficient a batch of features Guest • Apr 2017 • 7 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Built-in ad-blocker, complimentary and open-source. Guest • Feb 2018 • 1 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Read my review. Brave is Firefox babe with more than seclusion and clear user interface Akino Jun 2017 • 2 agrees and 4 disagrees Disagree    Agree
  • Cyberfox

    Cyberfox is a 64-bit adaptation (32-bit download also available) of Mozilla Firefox , compiled With Microsoft Visual Studio 2012, Windows 8 SDK & Intel Composer XE 2013.

    Costless Capable Source Windows Linux

    • Is "bigger" in capabilities than Firefox (which I've exploited come near alone for 15 geezerhood or so) -- Birth been victimisation Cyberfox with brainsick beloved for come on deuce-ace long time now, and upright had my affectionateness broken to discover they were closing it down as of commencement half of 2018. :( Guest • Sep 2017 • 4 agrees and 2 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Aborigine 64bit, fast, clean from adware, fishy extensions and it has it's possess exploiter profile. Many Firefox choice browsers parcel substance abuser profile with Firefox. Guest • Dec 2016 • 1 agrees and 2 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Excellent user support, to a lesser extent memory-intensive than either the official Firefox 64-bit or Waterfox (based on my system), and it full treatment with Firefox Sync. Guest • Mar 2017 • 0 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
  • Firefox Developer Edition

    Firefox Developer Edition brings your core dev tools together with approximately brawny unexampled ones that bequeath broaden your ability to work across multiple platforms from unity place....

    Destitute Exposed Author Mac Windows Linux PortableApps.com

    • If you consume issues with Firefox not being degenerate adequate but don't wanna go chome attempt this! Also faster than chrome. axy_david Jan 2018 • 2 agrees and 0 disagrees Disagree    Agree
  • SeaMonkey

    The SeaMonkey task is a biotic community campaign to acquire the SeaMonkey all-in-one internet application suite. A barge option to...

    Gratis Opened Germ Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD PortableApps.com

    • Less resource-intensive than Firefox. Generally degraded and stable. Guest • May 2017 • 2 agrees and 0 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Flatboat on resources, had UI we were ill-used to in dandy Firefox(version 3.x), around features corresponding webRTC might be missing. mzs_47 Sep 2015 • 2 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
    • Within Linux industrial plant a lot to a greater extent dissipated and compatible with Firefox extensions Guest • Jul 2015 • 1 agrees and 1 disagrees Disagree    Agree
  • Know whatsoever more alternatives to Mozilla Firefox?

    Suggest an application program to this list
  • Maxthon Cloud Browser

    Maxthon is a web browser with innovative features, hurrying and security. Features Tabbed document interface Saves receptive tabs in case of broadcast closedown or...

    Liberal Mac OS X Windows Linux Android iPhone ... Android Tablet iPad PortableApps.com

    • Warning Maxthon apparently collects medium data without asking: http://news.softpedia.com/news/maxthon-browser-collects-sensitive-data-even-if-users-opt-out-506327.shtml

Platforms

Show 19 to a lesser extent popular platforms